The family holding S.A.S. in Colombia: what it is for and when it is not the answer
Almost every family that asks about organizing its wealth arrives with the same sentence heard somewhere: it has to go into an S.A.S. Sometimes that is exactly what needs to be done. Sometimes it is what turns a manageable problem into an expensive one.
The simplified stock corporation, or S.A.S., was created by Law 1258 of 2008, and its flexibility explains why it displaced other corporate forms for family use. It can have a single shareholder, liability is limited to the contribution, and the bylaws allow tailor-made rules on voting, share transfers and management bodies.
What it does solve
It turns indivisible assets into divisible interests. A plot of land cannot be split among four children without subdividing or selling it. The shares of the company that owns the land can. It is the difference between transferring wealth in manageable pieces and having to liquidate the asset.
It separates control from ownership. The bylaws can define who decides and who receives, and they do not have to be the same person. For a family where the parents want to start transferring without losing control, that separation is the central tool.
It organizes the succession before it happens. With the company formed and the rules written, what is inherited are shares subject to an agreed regime, not loose assets about which each heir will have their own idea.
It allows gradual transfers. Not everything has to be decided in a single act. The interests can move in stages, with the tax burden spread over time instead of concentrated.
When it is not the answer
When the estate is essentially a family home. Colombia's estate exemptions are built around the property held by the deceased. Contributing the family home to a company can forfeit a benefit the family already had. For that profile there are simpler routes.
When the family is not going to run the company. An S.A.S. has ongoing obligations: accounting, tax returns, shareholder meetings, minutes, renewal of its commercial registration. Forming one and neglecting it produces a company in default that complicates any future transaction, including the sale of the asset it was meant to protect.
When it is created to put assets out of a creditor's reach. Article 42 of Law 1258 of 2008 is explicit: when the company is used to defraud the law or to the detriment of third parties, the shareholders and managers who carried out, took part in or facilitated the fraudulent acts are jointly and severally liable for the obligations and the damages caused. The declaration is processed before the Superintendence of Companies in a summary proceeding. A company formed for that purpose protects nothing and adds personal liability.
When the family conflict is already open. A corporate structure organizes agreements; it does not replace them. Forming a company among people who do not speak to each other moves the fight from the asset to the shareholders' meeting, with the difference that now there are minutes.
The question before the company
Before deciding the form, the goal has to be decided, and it is usually one of three: reducing the estate tax burden, avoiding co-ownership among heirs, or protecting the continuity of an operating business. These are different goals, and the same structure does not always serve all of them.
When the goal is defined first, the answer is sometimes an S.A.S., sometimes a transfer of bare ownership while keeping the usufruct, sometimes a gradual donation, and sometimes a combination. When the form is defined first, there is almost always too much structure and too little result.
How to know which one fits
Write the goal in one sentence, without naming any legal vehicle.
List the assets by type and by who uses them today.
Count how many people will be involved and how they are related.
Estimate what the estate would cost today, doing nothing.
That fourth point is the one that organizes the conversation, because it turns an emotional decision into a comparison of numbers.
At GB Partners we start there and only then propose a structure. Write to us and we will set up a first thirty-minute conversation.
Informational content only. It is not legal or tax advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship; each case depends on its own facts.
Responsible for this content: Camila Giraldo Bolívar, attorney admitted in New York and Colombia. GB Partners, Calle 5 A # 39-93, oficina 702, Medellín, Colombia. Phone and WhatsApp +57 305 234 6543. www.gbpartnersllc.com
Comments